Welcome Guest   | Login   
  Search  
  Index |  Recent Threads |  Register | 


Quick Go »
Thread Status: Normal
Total posts in this thread: 2
[Change thread status] [Delete this Thread] [Move this Thread]
[Add To My Favorites] [Watch this Thread] [Post new Thread]
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 75 times and has 1 reply Next Thread
clogevents
Newbie



Joined: Feb 9, 2016
Posts: 40
Status: Offline

Edit this Post   Practical difference between Responsive Iframe and fully-interactive embedded javascript calendar Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote
[Delete this Thread]

I realise that these are different ways of embedding the calendar in a website but these seem to give a similar end-result.

Is one method faster or better in some way?

What would be the reasons for choosing one over the other?
[Aug 8, 2017, 1:54:11 PM] [147.147.169.39] Show Post Printable Version [Link] Report threatening post: please login first  Go to top 
support
localendar Expert
Member's Avatar


Joined: Sep 15, 2004
Posts: 6027
Status: Offline
Edit this Post   Re: Practical difference between Responsive Iframe and fully-interactive embedded javascript calendar Reply to this Post
Reply with Quote
[Delete this Post]

The responsive iframe is superior in most respects because it won't have potential conflicts with other JS or CSS on the rest of your site.

Older browsers didn't support the kind of features that make a responseive iframe possible, which is why we initially created the fully interactive JS version.
----------------------------------------
Marc Higgins
Support Associate, localendar.com
Follow us on Twitter! http://www.twitter.com/localendar_news
[Aug 16, 2017, 8:39:49 PM] [69.126.188.75] Show Post Printable Version [Link] Report threatening post: please login first  Go to top 
[Show Thread Printable Version] [Post new Thread]

Help! | Cobranding | Legal | Privacy Policy | About localendar.com | Contact Us